In the workingman's city (Cité Ouvrières) in Mulhouse three types of housing can be found as
the main types of social housing for factory workers. These three also form a
continuation in the thinking about social housing. It would go to far as to
state that social housing started with the back-to-back, as it was a type often
built in inner-city areas from the late medieval period onward. But utilization
for housing workers is strongly linked to the industrial revolution and the
sudden need to house the workers for the factories and collieries. Before crafts
were either practiced at the home or in an artisans workshop. Mechanization of
production not only scaled up the production process and the place of
production -from a workshop to a factory- but also the amount of materials used
and the number of workers involved to produce the end product (the output of
which had also been dramatically increased). Mechanization also meant a shift
from skilled laborers with a trade towards low skilled workers that only had to
master certain parts of the production process. These workers were often
recruited from a rural population. This combined with the overcrowding in the
densely built up areas (slums) lead to miserable living conditions, which
resulted in low life expectancy and the necessity of a steady influx of new
workers that had to be trained and managed. Some factory owners quickly realized
that a reliable workforce capable of their tasks was important for the
longevity of their business. From a philanthropic viewpoint not all men were
equals but brethren of one kind. So it came to be that these lovers of humanity set out to improve
the living standers of their workmen, thereby ensuring their future business
success!
At first factory workers were housed in existing
dwellings, sometimes as lodgers, but more often in rented rooms or houses.
Savvy property owners quickly began subdividing existing houses into rentable
rooms, added extra rentable rooms in ramshackle lean-to's and built over any
existing outdoor space on the back which provided at times accommodation
without any windows or direct escape route. The first purpose-built workers
houses often were little more than low barracks subdivided into single room
accommodation. Some were more akin to the meager dwellings provided for working
peasants consisting of little more than a few rooms around a hearth. These were
called workers cottages and in continental Europe these were often combined into a short row under a single roof.
None of these barracks are present in Mulhouse. The
oldest representative of factory housing are the back-to-back houses built in
both the first and second Cité Ouvrières. These houses were cheap to build as
they didn't demand a large plot and could be constructed as apartments (one up
one down). In actual fact they could be built between roads (although in
Mulhouse they have a narrow garden at the front).
Back-to-back houses typically
share three walls with the neigbouring houses. They only had windows on one
side (the front).
A great improvement on the back-to-back was the
pioneering Mulhouse Quadrangle (Carré Mulhousien) with a garden on two sides.
These blocks of four dwellings under one roof were situated between narrow
lanes thus giving access to the gardens and the houses. The gardens were mainly
meant for food production and made the built-up area much more fire safe.
In the Mulhouse Quadrangle the
houses share only two walls with the neigbouring dwellings. These houses have
windows on two sides and also garden space around the building.
After 1875 the Mulhouse Quadrangle quickly falls out
of favor and rows of terraced houses become the norm. At first these rows of
single family dwellings under one roof are as long as the terrain or the road
pattern would allow. This is the cheaper way of building such accommodation. It
wouldn't be until the ideas of Camillo Sitte and Raymond Unwin combined in the
Garden City aesthetic that this practice would change.
In terraced rows of houses the
dwellings share two walls with the neighbouring dwellings. They have windows on
both the front and back and at least a back garden.
This is not accurate. Cite ouvriere in Mulhouse started with terraced, back-to-back and quarter-detached houses. The first two proved to be less efficient than the third which became quite popular. Terraced was the most expensive, and back-to-back was the cheapest but performed bad in terms of natural light and ventilation. You can read more here http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10039926/
ReplyDelete