The AUP Amsterdam of 1935 sought to plan the new city
for the estimated population in the year 2000. As the several parts were
elaborated in detailed urban plans reality forced the plans to be slightly
changed. This was however foreseen in the AUP, as it was set up as a blotch
plan with an indicative functional layout.
From the 1950s onwards the AUP was augmented to keep
up with the developments in traffic, industry, commercial space and housing.
The planned canal diversion north of the garden villages in the IJ-polders was
dropped. Instead a semicircular new canal was planned around Amsterdam North.
The area between this new semicircular canal and the
(garden) villages on the north side of the IJ was to be developed further to
create a new urban satellite. With the AUP the focus of the urban planners had
moved away from the suburban back to the urban, so the additions north of the
low and small houses were seen as high-rise housing in a green landscaped
setting as an intermediate to the open polder land beyond.
The augmented (and expanded) AUP of the 1960s is a
true regional plan that draws the city as fanning out from the historic core
around the Canal Belt creating suburban fingers very similar to well known German
examples. Urban expansion is concentrated beyond the garden villages (north), in
Zaandam (northwest), in Amstelveen (south), in the Bijlmermeer (southeast) and near
existing towns (Badhoevedorp, Diemen, Ouderkerk, Zwanenburg) with some smaller
developments.
A similar approach was taken to the southern
expansion. Here a rural area belonging to the municipality of Weesperkarspel
was transferred to Amsterdam in 1966. It included the deep Bijlmermeerpolder (a
former lake empoldered in 1626) and the shallow Oost-Bijlmer and West-Bijlmer
polders together with the Polder Gein en Gaasp.
This part of Amsterdam, officially called Amsterdam-Zuidoost (Amsterdam
Southeast), is best known as Bijlmer, itself a foreshortening of Bijlmermeer.
Building work for the Bijlmer started in 1966 on December 13. In 1968 the first
residents moved into the new homes.
The design for the Bijlmer, drawn by a team under
auspice of Siegfried Nassuth, was inspired by the ideas of CIAM: the functional
city and Le Corbusier in particular. The central idea in this high-rise
satellite was an almost absolute separation of all modes of transport by means
of elevated roads and paths. The idea behind this was to prevent accidents and
counter unsightly corners and urban fringes conform the ideas of the Swiss
architect Le Corbusier who stated that mankind in the modern era had a right to
a green, quiet and uncluttered living environment free of traffic.
In the original plans a motorway would dissect the
area and several wards consisting of high-rise buildings would be created. A height of ten building layers was the norm
in both the northern and southern parts, with the exception of Reigersbos and
Gein where 6 storey apartment block were envisaged. The best known part of the
southeastern satellite are the honeycomb apartment blocks in the Bijlmermeer. Each
ward (wijk) has been subdivided into neighbourhoods indicated by a letter (A,
B, D, E, F, G, H and K). Originally the streets and apartmentbuildings would be
named according to the letter of the neighbourhood. This principle has however
been abandoned in the renewal of the area. South of the A9 motorway the
southern part, known as Gaasperdam was divided into four wards: Holendrecht,
Nellestein, Reigersbos and Gein. The neighbourhoods named L, M, N, P, R, S, T,
V and W are located here. Much of the planned high-rise buildings were scrapped
due to new insights and replaced by low-rise apartment blocks and terraced
housing.
The new wards that were constructed around Amsterdam
after 1965 aren't exclusively located within the municipal boundaries of this
city. The second
AUP resulted in the construction of housing in: Diemen-Noord (1), Diemen-Zuid
and Duivendrecht (2) collectively known as Venserpolder, Bijlmermeer (3),
Gaasperdam (4), Ouderkerk-Oost (5), Amstelveen-Zuid (6), Amstelveen-Oost (7),
Akerveld Badhoevedorp (8), Zaandam-Oost (9), Molenwijk (10), Buiksloot (11),
Buikslotermeer (12) and Nieuwendam (13). Another focus was
providing industrial areas. The largest one would be concentrated in the
harbour (H). Most of these sites were large scale like for instance, Bullewijk
(w), Amstel 3 (iii) and Schiphol-Oost (S). Smaller in size were Zaandammerpolder
(Z) and Vogelweide (V). Parks and recreational areas were also incorporated in
the expansion plan. The Amsterdamse Bos (A) remained of regional importance. New
were the parks in Amsterdam Southeast: Bijlmerpark
(B), Bijlmerweide and Diemerbos (D) and Gaasperpark (G) with the Gaasperplas
(P) an artificial lake.
The whole of the Amsterdam Southeast satellite was
meant to a model for future urbanisation and living. It was to be a showcase of
the ultimate urban quarter for modern
living. The apartment were large, airy and light with easy access to Amsterdam,
local amenities and ample green communal space. The dream was defeated by
reality however. Within 10 years after completion of the first houses the area
gained a reputation for social destitution an high crime rates. As a result of
the development of Almere, the middleclass families never moved to the Bijlmer
and problem families were relocated here. As a result mostly low skilled,
poorly educated and often jobless people inhabited the area. From 1975 onwards
large groups of immigrants from Surinam joined them. This reality was far
removed from the ideals of the designers and their idealist vision of the
modern city with its strict functional separation, turned out to be less than
practical, rendering parts of the area deserted and dangerous after dark.
Of the iconic honeycomb-shaped apartment buildings
only a few sections now remain. Most of the Bijlmermeer has been redesigned,
abandoning the original ideas. Now rows of terraced housing replace the large
slabs and the public greenery, replacing it with small gardens, tarmac and
parking space. The result is a jumble of architectural ideas without much
structure and without much personality: an example of the fractional approach to
urban design where urban incidents and localized measures prevail that is now
so prevalent. I find it a sign of weakness and an admission of failure to
abandon designing the urban environment full stop as a reaction to the failure
of the big ideas of the past.